Judge David S. Doty's History of Misconduct

Judge David S. Doty Has a Lengthy History of Judicial Misconduct Such that his notorious reputation precedes him: JUDGE DOTY IS MENTIONED ON A JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT WEBSITE AS HAVING BEEN CHARGED!SEE:
http://www.clr.org/fed-judges.html (look for his name on the bottom half of the webpage)

An attorney with whom I spoke on my tapped phone line who’s name I will keep anonymous out of consideration spoke out on Notorious Judge Doty. “ I am familiar with Judge David Doty- let’s just leave it at that…I have to be careful what I say on this line. I am very sure that the NSA are on our line and on any line going from Canada into the United States, for a certainty, so we need to be careful what we say…”

http://www.members.aol.com/BrazilBoycott/ June 1998, Lambros' COMMERCIAL LIEN and Declaratory Judgment/complaint against Attorney Faulkner for malpractice. On February 14, 2001, Judge David S. Doty gave Attorney Faulkner IMMUNITY. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeal upheld Judge Doty's ORDER without even reviewing Lambros' appeal brief on October 17, 2001. April 13, 2001, MOTION TO VACATE ALL JUDGMENTS AND ORDER BY JUDGE ROBERT G. RENNER PURSUANT TO RULE 60(b)(6) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 28 USCA §455. On March 08, 2002, Judge David S. Doty dismissed Lambros' motion stating he did not have JURISDICTION. On April 10, 2002, Lambros filed a NOTICE OF APPEAL and MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. 3. February 13, 2001, (Filed February 14, 2001) ORDER by United States District Court Judge David S. Doty, in LAMBROS vs. FAULKNER. Please note that Judge Doty adopts the October 31, 2000 REPORT & RECOMMENDATION and affirms the conclusion that the state court would likely extend its grant of immunity to FAULKNER in this action. Also the Court stated, "plaintiff has adduced no evidence upon which a rational fact-finder could conclude that defense counsel's conduct in any way prejudiced plaintiff's defense or that defendant's coerced witnesses to give false testimony in plaintiff's criminal case." With all respect to Judge Doty, Lambros believes that Judge Doty is currently experiencing Alzheimer’s and/ or has misplaced some of the above documents in this action. After reading this ORDER please go to LAMBROS' February 23, 2001, RULE 59(e) that responds to Judge Doty's theory in this ORDER. Thank you. This ORDER is a total of five (5) pages. 4. October 23, 2003, ORDER by U.S. District Court Judge David S. Doty in USA vs. LAMBROS, Civil No. 99-28(DSD), Criminal No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD/FLN). Judge Doty states, "Because the court finds no intervening change in law requiring it to vacate its dismissal of defendant's purported Rule 60(b) motion or its denial of defendant's motion for COA, the present motion is denied." This document is seven (7) pages in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT. Of interest is the fact a HEARING FOR FULL DISCLOSURE ON THE RECORD has never been conducted in this case, as required by TITLE 28 U.S.C. 5455(e). See, BARKSDALE vs. EMERICK, 853 F.2d 1359 (6th Cir. 1988). DOWNLOAD JANUARY 02, 2002 MOTION DISCLOSING INVESTIGATION BY MINNESOTA OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY HERE IN PDF. DOTY DEFENDDS JUDGE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR: March 08, 2002, ORDER by U.S. District Court Judge David S. Doty in criminal action 4-89-82(5)(DSD) and civil action 99-28(DSD). Judge Doty dismissed this action against Judge Renner stating, "Because the court concludes that these motions are collateral to the substantive motion which is being dismissed and since the court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction over this matter, the court will dismiss all of these motions." This motion is five (5) pages and being offered in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. November 25, 2003, Lambros' "NOTICE OF APPEAL" and "MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY." USA vs. LAMBROS, Civil No. 99-28(DSD), Criminal No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD/FLN). Lambros requests a Certificate of Appealability as to the issue, "WHY CHIEF JUDGE JAMES M. ROSENBAUM NOR JUDGE DAVID S. DOTY DID NOT CONDUCT A FULL-HEARING AT WHICH THERE WOULD BE FULL DISCLOSURE ON RECORD FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE RENNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 28 U.S.C.A. § 455(e)?" The District Court was bound to conduct a HEARING as per precedent of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. See, MORGAN vs. CLARKE, 296 F.3d 638, 648 (8th Cir. 2002); IN RE KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, 85 F.3d 1353, 1359 (8th Cir. 1996); BARKSDALE vs. EMERICK, 853 F.2d 1359, 1361-1363 (6th Cir. 1988). This document is twenty (20) pages including cover letter to clerk and exhibits in PDF FORMAT. All pages are hand-numbered in the lower right hand corner to assure order. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT. February 20, 2004, Filed February 23, 2004, ORDER by District Court Judge David S. Doty in USA vs. LAMBROS, Civil No. 99-28(DSD), Criminal No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD/FLN). Judge Doty ordered Lambros' CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY denied. PLEASE NOTE that Judge Doty does not state one word in his order as to the reasons he would not conduct a FULL-HEARING AT WHICH THERE WOULD BE FULL DISCLOSURE ON RECORD FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE RENNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 28 U.S.C.A. § 455(e). WHY???? This document is six (6) pages in PDF FORMAT. This PDF DOCUMENT NEEDS ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT. DOTY HAS NO REGARD FOR LAW OR DEFENDANT’S RIGHTS November 15, 2004, Filed November 16, 2004, ORDER, by Judge David S. Doty, in LAMBROS vs. USA, No. 4-89-82(5) (US) (DSD). The court denied Lambros' motion, stating "Because he was represented by counsel and thus in the same position as other litigants who rely on their attorney,' defendant was not entitled to a legal explanation from the court." Remember Lambros filed all of his sentencing motions and Rule 33 motions himself and the resentencing court turned sentencing motions and/or issues into a Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion illegally. This ORDER from the court is four (4) pages in length. This PDF FORMAT document requires ADOBE ACROBAT READER INSTALLED ON YOU COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT August 16, 2005, ORDER, by Judge David S. Doty, in USA vs. LAMBROS, Criminal No. 4-89-82(5)(DSD). The Court denied Lambros' application for a certificate of appealability. NOTE: The court states Lambros has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" as required by 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2). This is somewhat strange as the United States Constitution offers everyone the right for a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, Art. 1, §9, cl. 2. This document is one (1) page in length and in PDF FORMAT. YOU NEED ADOBE ACROBAT READER TO VIEW AND PRINT THIS DOCUMENT. Judge Doty Threatens The James Family at Trial June 19 /06 Judge Doty’s Gestapo Threats Rendition at the Close of Our Trial: Judge Doty has a history of criminal charges and allegations against him as can be seen at the following web address: http://www.clr.org/fed-judges.html Of course his position as Senior District Court Judge has granted him immunity from due accountability under the law. At the close of our trial Judge Doty threatened to have the U.S. Marshalls follow us “to the ends of the earth” in the context of warning me that I had ought not fail to appear in attendance for the forthcoming sentencing subsequent to the (corrupted) trial. Judge Doty stated “and I’ll tell you right now, if you don’t show up for sentencing, I’ll send the U.S. Marshalls out hunting for you; He then likened his scenario to Hollywood, stating further “and Don’t Think It’s Not Like Hollywood because it is-they overdo the FBI in the movies – but Not the U.S. Marshals- THEY’LL HUNT YOU DOWN-EVEN YEARS LATER THEY’LL GET YOU…” Years from now they’ll pull you out of another country if they have to. I’ve seen it happen many times before! …But I’m not to worried (coyly) we have a pretty good relationship with Canada right now so I don’t see that being a problem at all. Judge David S. Doty Sr District Court Judge MN has corrupted himself entirely in this matter: He has facilitated the use of illegal application of law in allowing prosecution court room theatrics, a corrupted ‘blue collar’ (pre ordained/corrupted) jury pool with NSA, FBI, CIA as its components, misuse of the Spreigl Rule under rule 404b, and even more incredulous, the uttering of threats against us in the closing moments of the trial to the effect of the rendition detailed above. Judge Doty has truly placed himself above the law and beyond the law ____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________